1300 320 300Fear to return to Pakistan?
Our Expert Immigration Lawyers are currently helping Pakistanis to apply for PROTECTION VISA in Australia.
You may not be eligible.
Please read this page carefully before contacting us.
BOOK A CONSULTATION
ATTENTION: THIS VISA IS NOT FOR ALL PAKISTANIS IN AUSTRALIA
PLEASE READ THIS PAGE CAREFULLY BEFORE CONTACTING OUR OFFICE, AS YOU MAY NOT BE ELIGIBLE.
The Pakistan government is increasingly silencing critical voices of activists under the pretext of national security.
Enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings, and torture take place with impunity. And it’s not only the ones who oppose the government…
Blasphemy-related violence against religious minorities and the LGBTI community, fostered in part by government persecution and discriminatory laws, is frequent.
Authorities have failed to establish adequate protection or accountability for abuses against women and girls, including “honor” killings and forced marriage.
Over 490 people have been executed since the government ended an unofficial ban on the death penalty in late 2014.
Protection Claims from PAKISTAN:
- Christians and Christian converts
- LGBTI persons
- Women fearing gender-based violence
- Actual or perceived Political Opinion
- Ahmadis
- Hazaras & Turis
- Blasphemy-related violence
- High-profile Shi’a persons
PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT US IF YOUR ISSUE IS NOT LISTED
ONSHORE PROTECTION VISA – SUBCLASS 866
Our Immigration Lawyers can help you with your Onshore Protection Visa. Most of our protection visa clients are international students and tourists who fear to return to Pakistan and would like to stay in Australia permanently. We have a proven success record in assisting nationals of Pakistan.
ABOUT SUBCLASS 866 VISA
On 28 July 1951, the Refugee Convention was adopted by a United Nations Conference of Plenipotentiaries, in Geneva. Australia became a party (acceded) to the Convention on 22 January 1954. The Refugee Convention came into force on 21 April 1954.
Australia is a signatory to the 1951 Refugee Convention and the 1967 Protocol. This means that Australia has voluntarily committed to comply with their provisions in good faith and to take the necessary steps to give effect to those treaties under domestic law (Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Article 26).
Under Article 33(1) of the Refugee Convention, Australia has an obligation not to:
“… expel or return (‘refouler’) a refugee in any manner whatsoever to the frontiers of territories where his life or freedom would be threatened on account of his race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion”.
Claim your consultationTo be a refugee in Australia, an asylum seeker must be assessed as meeting certain legal criteria. The meaning of a ‘refugee’ in the Migration Act 1958 (the Act) is a person in Australia who is:
- outside their country of nationality or former habitual residence (their home country) and
- owing to a ‘well-founded fear of persecution’, is unable or unwilling to return to their home country or to seek the protection of that country.
This definition is forward-looking. Even if a person has suffered persecution in the past, they are not a refugee by the meaning in the Act unless they have a well-founded fear of persecution and there is a real chance they will be persecuted in their home country now, if they were to return. However, past events could establish a real chance of persecution if the person were to return.
A person might become a refugee after arriving in Australia. This could occur if there is a change of circumstances in their home country or a change in personal circumstances after they left that gives them a well-founded fear of persecution if they were to return.
FEAR OF PERSECUTION
Well-founded fear of persecution The Act states that a person has a well-founded fear of persecution if:
- they fear persecution for at least one of five reasons specified in the Act
- there is a real chance that, if the person returns to their home country, they would be persecuted for one or more of those reasons
the real chance of persecution relates to all areas of their home country - at least one of the five reasons must be the essential and significant reason for the persecution
- the persecution involves both ‘serious harm’ to the person and ‘systematic and discriminatory conduct’.
THE FIVE REASONS
Section 5J(1)(a) of the Migration Act provides an exhaustive list of the five reasons for which a person may claim that a persecutor is motivated to inflict harm upon them. The five reasons are consistent with those in Article 1A(2) of the Refugees Convention. The reasons are:
- Race
- Religion
- Nationality
- Membership of a particular social group (PSG – family and non-family)
- Political opinion.
COMPLEMENTARY PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS
Complementary protection is protection for those who are not refugees according to the Act, but who can’t return to their home country because they will suffer certain types of harm which engage Australia’s other protection obligations.
These obligations come from the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and have been incorporated into the Act.
A person can be granted a protection visa on the basis of complementary protection if there are substantial grounds for believing that there is a real risk the person will suffer ‘significant harm’ if they were removed from Australia to their home country.
The complimentary protection provisions enable visa applicants to claim protection on broader grounds than those contained in the Refugee Convention, reflecting Australia’s obligations under international human rights law.
International human rights law precludes countries from sending people back to places where they face a real risk of being arbitrarily deprived of their life, or a real risk of being tortured or exposed to other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
MIGRATION ACT 1958 (CTH)
Section 36(2A) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) largely gives effect to those obligations in domestic law. People at risk of this kind of harm are eligible for a protection visa. In this way, human rights law provides a ‘complement’ to protection under the Refugee Convention, hence the name ‘complementary protection’.
Specifically, section 36(2A) provides that Australia is not permitted to remove people to countries where they face a real risk of one or more of the following:
- arbitrary deprivation of life
- the death penalty
- torture
- cruel or inhuman treatment or punishment
- degrading treatment or punishment.
Complementary protection introduced greater efficiency, transparency and accountability into Australia’s protection regime. Prior to March 2012, Australia was unable to guarantee that people who did not meet the refugee definition in the Refugee Convention, but who nonetheless faced serious human rights abuses if returned to their country of origin or habitual residence, would be granted protection.
Particular social group
There are two types of particular social groups described in the Act. One provides criteria to be met if a person claims to have a well-founded fear of persecution because they are a member of a particular social group that consists of their family. The other type provides that a person will be a member of a particular social group if:
- each member of the group shares a characteristic
- the person shares, or is perceived as sharing, the characteristic
- any of the following apply:
- the characteristic is innate or immutable (cannot be changed)
- the characteristic is so fundamental to a person’s identity or conscience, they should not be forced to renounce it (go against it); or
- the characteristic distinguishes the group from the rest of society
- the characteristic is not a fear of persecution.
Serious harm
To have a well-founded fear of persecution, the persecution feared must involve serious harm to the person. Serious harm includes, but is not limited to:
- a threat to the person’s life or liberty
- significant physical harassment of the person
- significant physical ill treatment of the person
- significant economic hardship that threatens the person’s capacity to subsist (ability to survive)
- denial of access to basic services, where the denial threatens the person’s capacity to subsist (ability to survive)
- denial of capacity to earn a livelihood of any kind, where the denial threatens the person’s capacity to subsist (ability to survive).
Systematic and discriminatory conduct
To have a well-founded fear of persecution, the persecution feared must also involve systematic and discriminatory conduct.
- Systematic means the harm is not random or generalised, but is targeted against the person.
- Discriminatory means the conduct of the persecutor affects the person or members of a group in a way that singles that person or a group out from the rest of the community.
This means that if the serious harm feared by the person is not directed at them or a group to which they belong, for one of the five reasons above, the person does not have a well-founded fear of persecution and will not be a refugee.
Real chance of persecution
For the fear of persecution to be well founded, there must be a ‘real chance’ that the persecution would happen in the reasonably foreseeable future if the person was to return to their home country. Real chance means that the fear of persecution is not remote or far-fetched.
If there is a place in their home country where the person can live without a well-founded fear of persecution, they will not be a refugee. However, they must be able to safely and legally access that place.
Seeking protection from authorities in their home country
If the government or other parties that control all or a large part of the person’s home country is willing and able to offer effective protection to the person, they might not meet the definition of refugee. However, the person must be able to access the protection and the protection must be of a durable nature (provided on an ongoing basis). If the protection is able to be provided by the government, the protection must also include an appropriate criminal law, a reasonably effective police force and an impartial judicial system. If this protection is able to be provided, the person does not have a well-founded fear of persecution and will not be a refugee.
A right to enter and reside in another country
If a person has a right to enter and reside in another country in which they do not fear persecution or significant harm, they must take all possible steps to exercise that right. If they do not, they might not be a refugee.
Modifying behaviours
According to the Act, a person does not have a well-founded fear of persecution if they can take reasonable steps to modify their behaviour so as to avoid a real chance of persecution their home country. However, this would not be the case if such a change would:
- conflict with a characteristic that is fundamental to the person’s identity or conscience
- require the person to conceal or hide a characteristic that is innate or immutable (one that they could not change), or
- require the person to:
- change their religious beliefs, including by renouncing a religious conversion, or conceal their true religious beliefs, or cease to be
- involved in the practice of their faith
- conceal their true race, ethnicity, nationality or country of origin
- change their political beliefs or conceal their true political beliefs
- conceal a physical, psychological or intellectual disability
- enter into or remain in a marriage to which that person is opposed, or accept the forced marriage of a child
- alter their sexual orientation or gender identity or conceal their true sexual orientation, gender identity or intersex status.
Helping People Just Like You
Gobernadorcillo Z.
VISA APPROVED IN 3 MONTHS!I recently had the pleasure of working with Gold Migration Lawyers for my fiancé visa application, and I couldn’t be more satisfied with their service. From the very beginning, their team was incredibly supportive and professional, guiding me through every step of the process with ease.Special thanks to Saleh El Kheir and Juliana Aywaz, who directly assisted us. Their expertise and dedication were evident throughout, providing clear recommendations and actionable steps to fast-track the application.The standout was the swift processing and approval of my application. Their diligent work made the process much faster than usual, which was a huge relief for us.I highly recommend Gold Migration Lawyers to anyone in need of immigration assistance. Their dedication and efficiency are truly commendable!read more
Antonia L.
Thank you to Noor and Justin for helping with the spouse visa application which was granted in just under 6 months. They were both very helpful and ensured we had the right documentation for smooth processing.
Kayla S.
Walt at Gold Migration is an absolute star. He was consistently kind, provided easy to understand information and direction, and secured our partner visa within 8 months! Walt was always friendly on calls, available when we needed him and reassured us throughout the journey. 10/10 would recommend.read more
Leona A. M.
I contacted Gold Migration Lawyer in April this year (2024). On 30 August 2024 we received the fantastic news that our visas have been double granted. This is life changing for my partner. I would like to express our sincerest gratitude for the extraordinary time and work Gold Migration lawyers have done for us both (and a special shout out to our amazing lawyer Oliver Christiansen who helped make this possible with his support, expertise and professionalism, James Scott (our very first point of contact) and Aileen Chour-our last & bearer of great news). The professionalism, a friendly voice at the other end of the telephone line, the guidance and expert advice given was exceptionally outstanding and beyond words. Highly recommended without a doubt. Dreams do come true! Thank you for changing our lives Gold Migration Lawyers. Henry & Leonaread more
Jaanika K
We contacted Gold migration lawyers before applying for a partner visa. Walt made us feel confident with the service they provide so we hired them and no regrets - Walt was very quick to respond to any questions we had and provided us with the best service we could’ve wished for. I do recommend gold migration lawyers (and Walt) if you’re looking for one!read more
Sophie T.
Justin and his team were AMAZING! My immigration agent had disappeared and only 1 month was left on my visa! I was very distressed. I reached out to Justin and I couldn’t have found better help! They’re extremely knowledgeable! In less than a month, they built a strong decision-ready application. My visa was granted within 3 months instead of 5! I cannot thanks Justin and his team enough for all their help and support! I would recommend them anytime without a doubt.read more
Nyan Lin H.
Words cannot describe how happy I am with my experience! I approached Gold Migration Lawyers for help with lodging my protection visa application and I'm very grateful for the successful outcome. They were very knowledgeable and thorough during the process and the professionalism and understanding from the Team is simply unmatched. Thank you so much Ben, Liana, Walt, and Jibril for making my new life in Australia possible!read more
Ryan Wills, C.
My partner and I used Gold Migration for our partner visa. You will be hard pressed to find a migration lawyer with more integrity, attentiveness, or interest in providing genuine support for any challenge than Walt Calis at Gold Migration. He was(is) quick to respond and willing to do anything to help as it surfaced. You get what you pay for and we received consistent gold star service from Walt.read more
Niyomal G.
I am excited to share my experience with Gold Migration and their exceptional case manager, Saemeh Ghasemi and her team From start to finish, Saemeh and her team has been guiding us through the complex process of securing our visa. Her expertise, dedication, and personalized attention made all the difference. We are incredibly grateful for her support and highly recommend Gold Migration to anyone seeking expert assistance with their visa applications!read more
frequently asked questions
Can I lodge a Protection (866) Visa whilst in Australia?
If you are eligible, yes you can. The Protection (866) Visa can only be lodged whilst you are in Australia.
How would I be eligible for a Protection (866) Visa?
- You must be in Australia and have arrived here legally, on a valid visa. Such as a student visa or tourist visa.
- You must have a fear to return to your home country.
- Must establish that your fear is because you will be persecuted due to one or more grounds under the UN Convention (see above).
- Otherwise, must demonstrate that there is a real risk that you will suffer some specific sort of harm (see Complementary Protection Requirements discussed above)
Do I need to have an interview with the Department of Home Affairs?
Yes, the DHA will normally interview you to discuss the claims on your application. However, we have seen applicants being refused without even being invited to an interview.
The DHA will normally won’t interview the applicants who have lodged a weak protection visa application, where the applicant has provided vague claims and has failed to submit supporting evidence to reinforce their protection claims.
Can I travel back to my home country after a Protection Visa is granted?
A protection visa holder with Condition 8559 must apply to the DHA for permission to travel to their home country before they depart.
I am scared to go back to my home country because I will be persecuted. What are the different reasons that the DHA accepts this?
To have a well-founded fear of persecution, a person must fear serious harm because of their race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group and/or political opinion. Otherwise, the applicant’s claims must satisfy the complementary protection provisions of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).
Is subclass 866 Protection Visa a Permanent Visa?
Yes. This visa entitles holders to permanent residency and a pathway to citizenship and the ability to apply to sponsor their family.
What are the Non-refoulement obligations for Australia?
A non-refoulement obligation is an obligation not to forcibly return, deport or expel a person to a place where there are substantial grounds for believing that the person will be at a real risk of a specific type of harm. Australia has non-refoulement obligations under international treaties to which it is a party, including:
- the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (Refugee Convention) and its 1967 Protocol (non-refoulement obligation expressed in Article 33(1) of the Refugee Convention)
- the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT) (non-refoulement obligation expressed in Article 3)
- the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) (non-refoulement obligation implied in relation to Articles 6 and 7).
Will I get a Bridging Visa if I apply for the Protection Visa?
Yes, but only if you make a valid application. If your application is valid, you will be given a Bridging Visa to continue to stay in Australia until your protection visa application is finally determined. This means if your student visa or tourist visa expires, you won’t need to be concerned, as the Bridging Visa will allow you to stay in Australia during the processing time.
My student visa expired some time ago and I have lodged another student visa and still waiting for a decision. Can I apply protection visa?
Yes, you can. The fact that you have lodged a student visa and now you are on a bridging visa wont be an issue. In Australia, please can apply for multiple visa applications at the same time.
What does political opinion mean?
The scope and meaning of political opinion in the context of s5J(1)(a) of the Act is not defined. Nor is there any definition of political opinion within the Refugees Convention (Article 1A(2)) which 5J(1)(a) codifies. There is, however, significant direction from the courts on the matter.
A broad approach should be taken to determining what is political:
- political opinion is not limited to party politics
- political opinion extends to views contrary to the views of the State or opposition party
- political opinion may encompass opposition to corruption or whistle blowing
- political opinion may include knowledge of a fact
- a relevant opinion may be one expressly voiced by the person, or one which is merely imputed to them
- a political profile is relevant, but not necessary, to a political opinion claim
- a political opinion may be directly expressed or imputed from dress, music or behaviour, or the adoption of particular values or customs
- opinion that is yet to be expressed may be relevant to a claim under this ground
- as a general rule, prosecution under a law of general application will not amount to persecution for reason of political opinion
- a standard of reasonableness is expected in how and when a person chooses to express their political opinion.
