Who should pay attention to schedule 3 for partner visa

If you are applying for a partner visa onshore (Subclass 820) in Australia, you must understand what Schedule 3 criteria is.

Especially if you want to reduce the chances of a visa refusal.

Schedule 3 applies to anyone who is an unlawful non-citizen in Australia or holds a bridging visa. In other words, you do not hold a substantive visa.

If you do not hold a substantive visa, you must meet one of the following requirements to qualify for grant of an onshore partner visa:

  1. you entered Australia as the holder of a Subclass 995 (Diplomatic) visa or as a special purpose visa holder and at the time of entry, met specified requirements; and you satisfy Schedule 3 criterion 3002; or
  2. you satisfy Schedule 3 criteria 30013003 and 3004, unless the Minister for Immigration is satisfied that there are compelling reasons for not applying those criteria.

More on compelling reasons in a moment.

What is Schedule 3 criteria 3001, 3003 and 3004?

Below are the schedule 3 criteria that applies to onshore partner visas.

Schedule 3 Partner Visa – Criterion 3001

Schedule 3 criterion 3001 states that the visa application should be lodged by the applicant within 28 days of either their substantive visa ceasing or from when they entered Australia unlawfully.

Schedule 3 Partner Visa – Criterion 3003

Schedule 3 only applies if the applicant entered Australia unlawfully or did not hold a valid entry permit.

To waive this criterion, the Minister must be satisfied that the applicant became an illegal entrant because of factors beyond their control; and there are compelling reasons for granting the visa; and the applicant has been/ intends to continue complying with visa conditions.

Schedule 3 Partner Visa – Criterion 3004

Schedule 3 criterion 3004 applies if the applicant entered Australia unlawfully and has not subsequently been granted a substantive visa.

The minister must be satisfied that the applicant is not the holder of a substantive visa because of factors beyond their control; and there are compelling reasons for granting the visa; and the applicant has been/ intends to continue complying with visa conditions.

Can non-citizens who fall under the schedule 3 (3001, 3003 and 3004) apply for a partner visa?

Schedule 3 criteria recognise that there are circumstances that can arise where, despite the fact that a non-citizen has stayed in Australia after the expiry of their visa or even entered Australia illegally, they should nevertheless be able to remain onshore.

The individual circumstances of each applicant needs to be taken into account in explaining why they entered Australia unlawful or have remained in Australia beyond the expiry of their substantive visa.

If these circumstances are beyond these individuals control, they might still have grounds to apply for a partner visa.

We call these circumstances “compelling reasons”.

What are compelling reasons?

Compelling reasons for granting a substantive visa can be both based on personal circumstances or circumstances of another.

Examples include but are not limited to:

  • The applicant and their partner have an Australian child; In this case the child might be adversely affected in the absence of one of the parents.
  • The Australian partner will suffer if the applicant is not granted the substantive visa; or
  • Circumstances which are beyond the control of the applicant, for example, serious illness or accident. For example, a serious illness prevented the person to apply for a new visa before the expiration of the previous visa.

Compelling circumstances are assessed individually by the Department of Home Affairs and there is no definition made available in any migration provisions.

The Department of Home Affairs relies upon a standard definition of compelling meaning the circumstances were brought about by moral necessity.

If you have “compelling reasons” you could be able to waive schedule 3 during your partner visa application.

That said, it’s not easy to convince the Department you have genuine compelling reasons. You should seek partner visa legal advice.

Here is an example of partner visa letter you could receive from the Department of Home Affairs referencing Schedule 3?

Invitation to comment on information for a Partner (Subclass 801) visa

Schedule 3 Criteria – Compelling Reasons

When you lodged your Partner visa application you were not the holder of a substantive visa because your [previous visa name] ceased on [date].

For Partner visa applications lodged within Australia, the Migration Regulations state that, if you are not the holder of a substantive visa at the time of lodging your Partner visa application, you must satisfy additional Schedule 3 criteria (specifically, each of criteria 3001, 3003 and 3004), in addition to satisfying the standard Partner visa criteria. Schedule 3 criteria does not apply to offshore Partner visas, and failure to satisfy Schedule 3 does not prevent you from lodging a Partner application outside Australia.

Criterion 3001 requires that an application was made within 28 days after your substantive visa ceased. You do not meet criterion 3001, however the Migration Regulations allows the Schedule 3 criteria to be waived where there are compelling reasons for not applying those criteria.

The Migration Regulations 1994 do not prescribe the circumstances that need to be considered when assessing whether or not compelling reasons exist to not apply Schedule 3 criteria. Circumstances are considered on a case by case basis.

What should you do if you receive a letter from the Department of Home Affairs referencing Schedule 3 like the one above?

It’s highly recommended that you seek legal professional advice.

Schedule 3 can be waived. But it’s not easy.

Likewise, if your partner visa application has been refused under schedule 3, you can still appeal to the AAT. And you should seek professional advice.

We have successfully represented many clients with schedule 3 waiver applications…

Fill in the form below to see if our partner visa lawyers think you have “compelling reasons” to apply for a partner visa under schedule 3…

Helping People Just Like You

What matters to us most is what our clients have to say about their experience once everything has been resolved. Below are some of the messages we have received from people we’ve represented.

Rexhep Behluli
Rexhep B.
Andreas has done an amazing job on my visa application, in the verge of loosing hope, Andreas has come through, Andreas is the man for the complex visa applications can’t thank you enough for your efforts
Zuhayr Ali
Zuhayr A.
To the team at gold immigration lawyers. Not only are they true professionals, they are nothing but a team of champions. I cannot speak highly enough to Sarah McNeil and Saemeh Ghasemi for turning dreams into reality.Sarah and the team transferred a situation of turmoil and despair into a lifetime change in short amount of time.Highly recommend the team at gold immigration.read more
Sonia Ramjathan
Sonia R.
From the first day me and my partner went to Gold migration,they were very welcoming and very professional. They process my partner visa last year in August and i got both my 820 and 801 visa granted together in May this year,we are very grateful that we went to see them for doing our application. Specially thank you to Sarah McNeil who look after our visa she was excellent from the start to finish.I would recommend gold migration to my friends and family.everything was done perfectly without any doubt and very helpful as well.read more
Sadiya Chang
Sadiya C.
I recommend Sarah McNeil for anybody looking to get help with their protection visa.She has been amazing and because of her hard work and so much dedication towards my case the case officer only spent 25 minutes to take my interview and my visa was granted within a month after the interview.read more
Jaea Youn
Jaea Y.
Saemeh, who was looking after the partner visa application, was amazing. Prompt reply, great communication, and friendly! Thank you Gold Migration. I got my visa granted in just 2months and 2 weeks! Much quicker than expected.
sam saab
sam S.
From the first call and conservation we had ,I knew they are the right lawyers for the job. We did a meeting and I didn’t even need to think about it twice , it was clear they are the right people ( lawyers ) for the job , they professional with a high level of attention for details and great communication skills and fast responses .very accurate about all requirements and how to address it .we kept a steady communication through the process and gave us a full guidance and help n our paper work . As a result my wife visa was granted in a record time . Like to thx all the team at Gold lawyers , special thx and appreciation for Andreas ,Kiriaki and Rita .Much love and respect .read more
Patrick Cadei
Patrick C.
Perfect service and everything is looked after very well. They managed to get approved the Visa I was seeking within an excellent timeframe. Strongly recommend their services
Jake Cockburn
Jake C.
Gold Immigration lawyers helped us to get our Visa is Record time! We are very happy with the experience and excited for the next step of our journey!Thank you very much!Would recommend!!!
Bryan Mármol
Bryan M.
I am very thankful to Gold Migration for helping me obtain my permanent residency through the protection visa in a record time of 11 MONTHS. Since the beginning, they have been very professional and Kiriaki accompanied me and guided me through the whole process. She always looked out for me and thanks to her and the entire team, I achieved my residency.I would highly recommend them and thank you again.Bryan Marmolread more