LGBT Protection Visa

Are you a LGBTI from Malaysia? Do you fear returning to Malaysia?

Our Expert Immigration Lawyers have more than 12 years of experience helping LGBTI people from Malaysia to get a PROTECTION VISA in Australia

Fill in the form now to meet with our Protection Visa Lawyers

Law Council of Australia
Best Immigration Law Firm

MALAYSIAN LGBTI – PROTECTION VISA

In May 2018, Malaysia saw its first change of government since independence.

In its election manifesto, the new government promised to abolish oppressive laws and make Malaysia’s human rights “respected by the world”.

However, little has been done to address the issue of sexual orientation and gender identity.

Article 8 of the Constitution protects the right to equality before the law for all citizens regardless of religion, race, descent, place of birth, or gender. Sexual orientation and gender identity are not included in this list.

The Malaysia Penal Code does not specifically refer to homosexuality but deals with actions that go against the ‘order of nature’. Article 337A of the Penal Code, states: ‘Any person who has sexual connection with another person by the introduction of the penis into the anus or mouth of the other person is said to commit carnal intercourse against the order of nature.

Article 377B of the Penal Code, states: ‘Whoever voluntarily commits carnal intercourse against the order of nature shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to twenty years and shall also be punished with whipping.

As noted in the US Department of State’s human rights report for 2019 (USSD Report 2019) published in March 2020: “Authorities often charged transgender persons with “indecent behaviour” and “importuning for immoral purposes” in public. Those convicted of a first offense faced a maximum fine of RM25 ($6.25) and a maximum sentence of 14 days in jail. The sentences for subsequent convictions are fines of up to RM100 ($25) and up to three months in jail.”

Malaysia has 13 states and 3 federal territories. All have state-enacted Islamic laws that prohibit same-sex relations and criminalise trans women based on their gender identity and gender expression, while some criminalise trans men. Malaysia is one of the few countries in the world that locks people up simply for being transgender.

Several sources noted that in August 2018 the country’s oldest gay bar, the Blue Boy club, had been raided. Twenty men were detained and ordered into counselling for illicit behaviour.

Several sources reported that in August 2018 a sharia court ordered a lesbian couple to be caned after they were caught having sex in their car.

Several sources reported in November 2019 that 5 men were sentenced to jail, fines and caning by the Selangor Syariah High Court for attempted sexual intercourse following a 2018 raid on an apartment. Four of the
5 men were caned and released pending appeal of their jail sentence and the fifth was hoping to appeal his entire sentence. A further 6 individuals were due to face trial on the same charges.

The Asia Pacific Transgender network report of 2017 noted that: “Trans people in Malaysia face systemic and widespread stigma and human rights violations. Muslim trans people are subject to arrests, harassment and assault from federal, state, and local Islamic religious authorities, and often avoid reporting these incidents for fear that the police will not protect them.”

LGBTI MALAYSIANS “WELL-FOUNDED FEAR OF PERSECUTION”

If you have a well-founded fear of persecution due to your gender identity or sexual orientation in Malaysia, you may be eligible for a Protection visa (subclass 866).

The first requirement states that you must fear persecution for at least one of five reasons specified in the Act:

  • Race
  • Religion
  • Nationality
  • Membership of a particular social group (PSG)
  • Political Opinion

LGBTI persons in Malaysia form a particular social group (PSG), within the meaning of the Refugee Convention because they share an innate characteristic or a common background that cannot be changed, or share a characteristic or belief that is so fundamental to their identity or conscience that they should not be forced to renounce it, and have a distinct identity which is perceived as being different by the surrounding society.

Although LGBTI persons in Malaysia form a PSG, establishing such membership may not be sufficient to be recognised as a refugee.

Our Immigration Lawyers can help you with your Onshore Protection Visa. Most of our LGBTI protection visa clients are international students and tourists who fear to return to their home country and would like to stay in Australia permanently. We have a proven success record in assisting nationals of Malaysia.

Claim your consultation

FEAR OF PERSECUTION

Well-founded fear of persecution The Act states that a person has a well-founded fear of persecution if:

  • they fear persecution for at least one of five reasons specified in the Act (race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, political opinion)
  • there is a real chance that, if the person returns to their home country, they would be persecuted for one or more of those reasons
    the real chance of persecution relates to all areas of their home country
  • at least one of the five reasons must be the essential and significant reason for the persecution
  • the persecution involves both ‘serious harm’ to the person and ‘systematic and discriminatory conduct’.

COMPLEMENTARY PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS

The complimentary protection provisions enable visa applicants to claim protection on broader grounds than those contained in the Refugee Convention, reflecting Australia’s obligations under international human rights law.

International human rights law precludes countries from sending people back to places where they face a real risk of being arbitrarily deprived of their life, or a real risk of being tortured or exposed to other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

MIGRATION ACT 1958 (CTH)

Section 36(2A) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) largely gives effect to those obligations in domestic law. People at risk of this kind of harm are eligible for a protection visa. In this way, human rights law provides a ‘complement’ to protection under the Refugee Convention, hence the name ‘complementary protection’.

Specifically, section 36(2A) provides that Australia is not permitted to remove people to countries where they face a real risk of one or more of the following:

  • arbitrary deprivation of life
  • the death penalty
  • torture
  • cruel or inhuman treatment or punishment
  • degrading treatment or punishment.

Complementary protection introduced greater efficiency, transparency and accountability into Australia’s protection regime. Prior to March 2012, Australia was unable to guarantee that people who did not meet the refugee definition in the Refugee Convention, but who nonetheless faced serious human rights abuses if returned to their country of origin or habitual residence, would be granted protection.

There are two types of particular social groups described in the Act. One provides criteria to be met if a person claims to have a well-founded fear of persecution because they are a member of a particular social group that consists of their family. The other type provides that a person will be a member of a particular social group if:

  • each member of the group shares a characteristic
  • the person shares, or is perceived as sharing, the characteristic
  • any of the following apply:
    • the characteristic is innate or immutable (cannot be changed)
    • the characteristic is so fundamental to a person’s identity or conscience, they should not be forced to renounce it (go against it); or
    • the characteristic distinguishes the group from the rest of society
  • the characteristic is not a fear of persecution.

To have a well-founded fear of persecution, the persecution feared must involve serious harm to the person. Serious harm includes, but is not limited to:

  • a threat to the person’s life or liberty
  • significant physical harassment of the person
  • significant physical ill treatment of the person
  • significant economic hardship that threatens the person’s capacity to subsist (ability to survive)
  • denial of access to basic services, where the denial threatens the person’s capacity to subsist (ability to survive)
  • denial of capacity to earn a livelihood of any kind, where the denial threatens the person’s capacity to subsist (ability to survive).

To have a well-founded fear of persecution, the persecution feared must also involve systematic and discriminatory conduct.

  • Systematic means the harm is not random or generalised, but is targeted against the person.
  • Discriminatory means the conduct of the persecutor affects the person or members of a group in a way that singles that person or a group out from the rest of the community.

This means that if the serious harm feared by the person is not directed at them or a group to which they belong, for one of the five reasons above, the person does not have a well-founded fear of persecution and will not be a refugee.

For the fear of persecution to be well founded, there must be a ‘real chance’ that the persecution would happen in the reasonably foreseeable future if the person was to return to their home country. Real chance means that the fear of persecution is not remote or far-fetched.

If there is a place in their home country where the person can live without a well-founded fear of persecution, they will not be a refugee. However, they must be able to safely and legally access that place.

If the government or other parties that control all or a large part of the person’s home country is willing and able to offer effective protection to the person, they might not meet the definition of refugee. However, the person must be able to access the protection and the protection must be of a durable nature (provided on an ongoing basis). If the protection is able to be provided by the government, the protection must also include an appropriate criminal law, a reasonably effective police force and an impartial judicial system. If this protection is able to be provided, the person does not have a well-founded fear of persecution and will not be a refugee.

If a person has a right to enter and reside in another country in which they do not fear persecution or significant harm, they must take all possible steps to exercise that right. If they do not, they might not be a refugee.

According to the Act, a person does not have a well-founded fear of persecution if they can take reasonable steps to modify their behaviour so as to avoid a real chance of persecution their home country. However, this would not be the case if such a change would:

  • conflict with a characteristic that is fundamental to the person’s identity or conscience
  • require the person to conceal or hide a characteristic that is innate or immutable (one that they could not change), or
  • require the person to:
    • change their religious beliefs, including by renouncing a religious conversion, or conceal their true religious beliefs, or cease to be
    • involved in the practice of their faith
    • conceal their true race, ethnicity, nationality or country of origin
    • change their political beliefs or conceal their true political beliefs
    • conceal a physical, psychological or intellectual disability
    • enter into or remain in a marriage to which that person is opposed, or accept the forced marriage of a child
    • alter their sexual orientation or gender identity or conceal their true sexual orientation, gender identity or intersex status.

Helping People Just Like You

What matters to us most is what our clients have to say about their experience once everything has been resolved. Below are some of the messages we have received from people we’ve represented.

Navraj Singh Luthra
Navraj Singh L.
I had a great experience working with Vivek from Gold Migration Lawyers on my partner visa (subclass 820). From start to finish, he was extremely professional, transparent, and genuinely empathetic towards our situation.What stood out the most was his clear communication and prompt responses — we were never left confused or waiting too long for answers. He explained every step of the process in a simple and honest way, which made a stressful situation much easier to handle.Vivek was always approachable and made us feel confident that our application was in good hands. Thanks to his guidance and support, we achieved a successful outcome.Highly recommend Vivek and the team to anyone needing immigration assistance.read more
cory
cory
We recently applied for the Partner Visa 801 and had the pleasure of working with Jessie Li from Gold Migration Lawyers. Our case was quite difficult, as we had not lived together for very long, but Jessie Li guided us through the entire process with incredible skill and care.She helped us tremendously by:- Assisting with our documents and carefully revising them- Giving us regular updates so we always knew what was happening- Guiding us step-by-step to ensure we had the best possible chance of successThanks to Jessie’s Li expertise, we felt supported and confident throughout what could have been a very stressful time. She truly is the best at what she does.The only downside is that their services are a bit on the pricey side, but in our experience, they were absolutely worth it for the level of professionalism, support, and peace of mind we received.We are very grateful to Jessie Li and Gold Migration Lawyers for all their help.read more
Robert Everitt
Robert E.
Gold Migration Lawyers for ImmigrationI found Bilal Ahmad of Gold Migration Lawyers very helpful in helping me receive my subclass 100 Partner Visa in record time of just two months.They tell me it is extremely rare to be granted this Visa so quickly, I put it down to Bilal from Gold Migration Lawyers being so prompt in any question I had.I always received a response from Bilal very quickly. He was very thorough in making sure we had everything that was required and correct.Five stars for the best service!read more
Rachel D
Rachel D
Gold Lawyers were fantastic when my husband and I applied for the partner visa, We were updated often about our progress and I highly recommend them to anyone needing assistance.A special Thankyou to Vivek,From 2653 😊
Len Gorres
Len G.
Thank you so much Gold Migration Lawyers for assisting our Partner Visa (Subclass 309/100) application all the way for more than a year. Especially thanks to Bilal who did the biggest part of this journey from biometrics taking upto the last part of the application. It was a long journey but Gold Migration Lawyers have made it possible as we got the double grant visa. Again, thank you so much for everything. Now me and my partner can start our forever together, no more LDR. ❤️ ❤️read more
Donna
Donna
I would highly recommend Gold Immigration Lawyers especially Bilal Ahmad who was dealing with my Visa case. Bilal was very professional, acknowledgeable and supportive over the 2 year time frame dealing with him. Due to unforeseen circumstances I didn’t get to the end to get an answer unfortunately but I cannot speak highly enough of Bilal for the timeless effort he put into my case.read more
Zeek K
Zeek K
I’m truly grateful to Gold Migration Lawyers, especially Mr Ahmad, for all their support and dedication in helping me with my visa. From the very beginning, they showed kindness, professionalism, and genuine care.Mr Ahmad guided me through every step and represented me with great commitment at my ART hearing. Thanks to their hard work and faithfulness, my case was successful, and my claim has been remitted.I can’t thank them enough for being there for me during such a difficult time. I highly recommend Gold Migration Lawyers to anyone who needs trusted and compassionate immigration support.read more
Kiwi Josh
Kiwi J.
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ Exceptional Service — Our Visa Granted Today!My fiancée and I are beyond grateful to Gold Migration for their incredible work in helping us secure our visa — granted today!From day one, Callum and Kim went above and beyond to guide us through every challenge of our complex situation. They handled every document, delay, and uncertainty with such patience, diligence, and professionalism that we always felt confident we were in the best hands.Our case was not a straightforward one, yet the Gold Migration team approached it with absolute dedication communicating clearly, and providing reassurance at every stage. Their attention to detail and depth of knowledge truly set them apart.We are both deeply impressed and thankful for the outstanding effort and genuine care shown throughout the process. Gold Migration turned what could have been a stressful journey into a success story, and we cannot recommend them highly enough.Thank you, Callum and Kim — your expertise and commitment have changed our lives.— Joshua & Nattayaread more
Margaretha lim
Margaretha L.
Thank you so much for Joshua Elsbury and Gold Migration Lawyers, I over the moon when wake up in very early morning at 5am (indonesia time) , where in australia is 9am, Joshua send me email that my 309 visa is granted, and not only that, he pleased to announce, I got Double granted in 6 months. Which is DHA also finalised visa 100. Im officially Permanent Resident of Australia. Keep up Gold Migration Lawyers Firm, I really recommend this firm to anyone that seek or on doubt with visa processing. Please hurry to book appointment here. Joshua, he is kind, prompt and really some can discuss and make us no doubt about our visa.read more

frequently asked questions

If you are eligible, yes you can. The Protection (866) Visa can only be lodged whilst you are in Australia.

There are 4 different offshore visas that you may be eligible to apply for. They are the Refugee (200) Visa, the In-Country Special Humanutarian (201) Visa, the Emergency Rescue (203) Visa and the Woman At Risk (204) Visa.

You must be in Australia, and arrived here legally, on a valid visa, and be immigration cleared on arrival. You must also be a genuine refugee, meet the DHA’s identity requirements, not have held specific visas and more.

Yes, the DHA will interview you to discuss the claims on your application.

A protection visa holder with Condition 8559 must apply to the DHA for permission to travel to their home country before they depart.

To have a well-founded fear of persecution, a person must fear serious harm because of their race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group and/or political opinion.